Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Childish superstition: Einstein's letter makes view of religion relatively clear



"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." So said Albert Einstein, and his famous aphorism has been the source of endless debate between believers and non-believers wanting to claim the greatest scientist of the 20th century as their own.

A little known letter written by him, however, may help to settle the argument - or at least provoke further controversy about his views.

Due to be auctioned this week in London after being in a private collection for more than 50 years, the document leaves no doubt that the theoretical physicist was no supporter of religious beliefs, which he regarded as "childish superstitions".

Einstein penned the letter on January 3 1954 to the philosopher Eric Gutkind who had sent him a copy of his book Choose Life: The Biblical Call to Revolt. The letter went on public sale a year later and has remained in private hands ever since.

In the letter, he states: "The word god is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this."
Einstein, who was Jewish and who declined an offer to be the state of Israel's second president, also rejected the idea that the Jews are God's favoured people.

"For me the Jewish religion like all others is an incarnation of the most childish superstitions. And the Jewish people to whom I gladly belong and with whose mentality I have a deep affinity have no different quality for me than all other people. As far as my experience goes, they are no better than other human groups, although they are protected from the worst cancers by a lack of power. Otherwise I cannot see anything 'chosen' about them."

The letter will go on sale at Bloomsbury Auctions in Mayfair on Thursday and is expected to fetch up to £8,000. The handwritten piece, in German, is not listed in the source material of the most authoritative academic text on the subject, Max Jammer's book Einstein and Religion.

One of the country's leading experts on the scientist, John Brooke of Oxford University, admitted he had not heard of it.

Einstein is best known for his theories of relativity and for the famous E=mc2 equation that describes the equivalence of mass and energy, but his thoughts on religion have long attracted conjecture.

His parents were not religious but he attended a Catholic primary school and at the same time received private tuition in Judaism. This prompted what he later called, his "religious paradise of youth", during which he observed religious rules such as not eating pork. This did not last long though and by 12 he was questioning the truth of many biblical stories.

"The consequence was a positively fanatic [orgy of] freethinking coupled with the impression that youth is being deceived by the state through lies; it was a crushing impression," he later wrote.
In his later years he referred to a "cosmic religious feeling" that permeated and sustained his scientific work. In 1954, a year before his death, he spoke of wishing to "experience the universe as a single cosmic whole". 

He was also fond of using religious flourishes, in 1926 declaring that "He [God] does not throw dice" when referring to randomness thrown up by quantum theory.

His position on God has been widely misrepresented by people on both sides of the atheism/religion divide but he always resisted easy stereotyping on the subject.

"Like other great scientists he does not fit the boxes in which popular polemicists like to pigeonhole him," said Brooke. "It is clear for example that he had respect for the religious values enshrined within Judaic and Christian traditions ... but what he understood by religion was something far more subtle than what is usually meant by the word in popular discussion."

Despite his categorical rejection of conventional religion, Brooke said that Einstein became angry when his views were appropriated by evangelists for atheism. He was offended by their lack of humility and once wrote. "The eternal mystery of the world is its comprehensibility."

Monday, January 21, 2013

Bob Dylan and Freedom

"Blowin' in the Wind",Bob Dylan,1962
How many roads most a man walk down
Before you call him a man ?
How many seas must a white dove sail
Before she sleeps in the sand ?
Yes, how many times must the cannon balls fly
Before they're forever banned ?
The answer my friend is blowin' in the wind
The answer is blowin' in the wind.

Yes, how many years can a mountain exist
Before it's washed to the sea ?
Yes, how many years can some people exist
Before they're allowed to be free ?
Yes, how many times can a man turn his head
Pretending he just doesn't see ?
The answer my friend is blowin' in the wind
The answer is blowin' in the wind.

Yes, how many times must a man look up
Before he can see the sky ?
Yes, how many ears must one man have
Before he can hear people cry ?
Yes, how many deaths will it take till he knows
That too many people have died ?
The answer my friend is blowin' in the wind
The answer is blowin' in the wind.

Remembering MLK and What Freedom Means to All of Us

..."Let us not wallow in the valley of despair. I say to you today, my friends, that in spite of the difficulties and frustrations of the moment, I still have a dream.

It is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream.

I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed. "We hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal." ...


I Have a Dream Speech

Martin Luther King, Jr.
August 28, 1963
Washington, DC

Saturday, January 12, 2013

Essential, Quintessential Shel Silverstein....

"No Difference"
by Shel Silverstein, from Where the Sidewalk Ends. © Harper Collins, 1974. I do not own the rights.

Small as a peanut
Big as a giant,
We’re all the same size
When we turn off the light.

Red, black or orange,
Yellow or white
We all look the same
When we turn off the light.

So maybe the way
To make everything right
Is for God to just reach out
And turn off the light!

To Die of a Broken Spirit...

A great music genius bullied (to death?) for his homosexuality. Whether he committed suicide or died of cholera, scholars still disagree. But it is quite possible to be an accomplished white male homosexual composer in conservative white late 19th century Russia and still die of a broken spirit.

let not the inconsequential distract you. just listen...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ejs4LJ3upjs


P.S. Copyright goes to all respective owners of the recording/video. I do not own or claim any rights as to the music/video. It will be removed upon request.

Friday, January 11, 2013

100 хубави думи за България

100 хубави думи за България
http://www.dw.de/100-%D1%85%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B8-%D0%B4%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B8-%D0%B7%D0%B0-%D0%B1%D1%8A%D0%BB%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%8F/a-15291983



Всички мои приятели и доста познати, с които съм имала съприкосновение в последните вече 14 години в поне 4 американски щата, се удивляват искрено на красотата на българския език така както са ни чували да го говорим. Мнозина от тях (далеч не всички бяха дружелюбни към "пъстри" акценти след 11-ти септември) също са долавяли акцента му в английският ни и са запитвали от къде е този красив език. След като надълго и нашироко им е било обяснявано чрез бързи уроци по българо-славянска култура, писменост, география и история, повечето от тези познати са оставали с приятното убеждение, че от това което чуват и виждат в нашето поведение и отношение, България е страна с богат бит, култура и древна история, досотйна за посещение и обмен на опити. С удоволстиве сме поканили на екскурзия много от тези познати и сме готови да им станем пътеводители. Някои вече посетиха.

От друга страна, на гости при нас и при тях, често са се намирали български гозби - лютеница, баница, гювеч по български, кавърма и капама по български, български сърми, пити, десерти. Всички единодушно се съгласяват с красивия ни кулинарен вкус и усет към свежото и питателното. На маса с приятели често е била представена както и литературата, народната и симфоничната музика на България, така и нейната силна традиция в театреалното и кино изкуството, а напоследък и позививното развитие на глобалните техологии.

В универскитетските ми години по история на изкуството в задължителни презентации на не-западно изкуство, мой избор винаги е била България и нейните икони, църкви, манастири, възрожденска архитектура, тъкани, килими, бродерии, керамика, златни съкровища, древни гробници, мавзолеи и паметници от миналото и не-далечното ни минало.

Тези примери, както и техният личен контакт/опит с много лъчезарни, интелектуални, гостоприемни и трудолюбиви представители на нашия народ в САЩ, са нещата, с които нашите приятели и познати тук помнят и си представят България. Нека пазим добрия й дух и облик и нека не я представяме негативно зад граница, но нека си осъзнаваме и признаваме пробемите в границите й.

T-Shirt Bordello - Amazing Graphic Art & Design!

Oooh, now that's a dirty laundry!!!

http://www.tshirtbordello.com/Dj-Leia-T-Shirt

ABOUT GUILT-TRIP

Recently, I shared some thoughts on prejudice. About the what's and the why's of The Different. Because Different is often the twin face of Guilt, let's talk about guilt-trip.

The moment we are born a pair of eyes is thrust into our faces examining our breathing, pulse, color, reflexes, sounds, i.e. our APGAR score is being assessed. "Hello! And welcome to Guilt-Trip!" Of course, we are expected to breathe normally, to exhibit stable heart rhythm, to manifest our sucking and grasping reflexes, etc, otherwise, our entry into this guilt-ridden world would justifiably need assistance.
So far so good. We grow, we sleep, we poop our diapers, we take in stable amounts of nourishment in a myriad of forms and somehow manage to exhibit expected growth on predetermined medical charts. All this is wonderful and magnificent and leads us on to our physical and mental maturation and formation of ourselves as human individuals. And then...
BAM!!!
It all begins at the potty, at the playground, at the daycare center or while visiting at grandma's and grandpa's or any with other social-caregiver group...Enters the expectation to per-form and meet a norm, to con-form, re-form, de-form, in-form. Spelled out alternatively, we learn to perform people's expected behaviors, traditions, mores, to conform to people's expected ideas/values, to inform them of our intents, report misbehaviors and malcontents, to deform our views to suit people's perceived systems of behavioral normality. In brief, we are asked to learn to reform. For, that which we are is not quite good enough. Is it ever? And, that which we are or what we could be, are not always socially acceptable. Especially in early age. But more so in adulthood as we grow conditioned, prejudiced, dependent upon opinions and approval, as we learn to navigate the tricky labyrinths of human relationships.

Enter teenage age. BAM! BAM! Boom! Boom!
The individual is born. Rebellion, blood, scratches, bruises, adulthood. Welcome. Now - survival.

Fight! ... if you can...Fight! but they didn't tell you how...All they told you was don't do that! ...Fight! ...but "you shouldn't, you mustn't, you ought not dare to"....
For the "good of society", in line at our front door, waiting patiently, await entry, in no particular order of importance or superiority, the notions of Looks or Self- Image, Education or Expertise, Job or Career, Profession or Skill-set , Marriage or Relationship, Childbirth or Child-rearing, Social Life or Integration into Social Circles, Traditions, Cultures, Legacies. Add, multiply, divide, subtract, square-root it, vector it, sine and cosine it, do whatever equation you need to (hey, I am not a mathematician!) - you end up at DIVISION. All members of society neatly divided and separated in clear, pre-defined, easily manageable, well-controlled categories and expected models of behavior. Divided, mind you, is not equivalent to Different. One is an imposed category, a pigeonhole, a cubicle, the other is a hard fought, hard-thought choice. Division truly doesn't work. It will inevitably reach a dead end - white but what shade of white, black, Asian, Latin, Eskimo? Gay, straight, in the middle, neither? Transgender, no-gender, multi-gender? "We don't have these categories here", or, as Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad postulated - "there are no gays in Iran" :)

But what if...?

But what if we wake up day in and day out at a desk, or work space, or just at no particular place at all, and instead of pouring out our creative energies into the new day's labor, we are miserably stuck? Why is it that a particular painting or file isn't coming out well at all? What if the essay sucks, what if this music piece is too hard to finish, what if the person mom and dad want us to marry isn't "us" material, what if we don't belong at home, what if we find ourselves lost....?What if, instead, we are responding to years upon years of well-meant but guilt-laden instruction, of being told "good, but not quite", "proficient but not sufficient", "clever but not intelligent", "promising but unmotivated"...What if we have encapsulated so much opinion and judgment and advice from well-wishers-would-be-meddlers that one given day we find ourselves pointing the gun of accusation in the mirror, firing "you are worthless!", "you are nothing!", "you are no one!","you are not good enough!", "you don't matter", "you are wrong!", "you don't make enough!", "you deserve to be treated/talked to this way!"....

What if...
Or, is it that we are used to cultures and heritages where we perpetually kill the different in the individual, where any stray attempt at Differentness in thinking, viewing, in approaching, in taking an attitude is subjugated and stifled? We are masters of the art of killing the " I "with the guilt supplied by "them"...be it our own "I" or that which depends on us...

Why so much pain for so little gain?...

Guilt-trip is a very cruel, medieval thing. Especially when it is premeditated. Guilt-trip has no home country, nationality, race, religion, age, gender. It has one thing - the thirst for control. It is triggered by the loss of control. It becomes an attempt (or success) at regaining control. Why manipulate an individual's or a group's feelings, beliefs, energies? Why bring up a uniform society of children, mothers, fathers, men, women? For, here, room about third gender or no-gender does not exist at all...

Why, because it is important to think and feel in control (which we truly do not have). There are so many expectations aside from the usual necessary do-good/do-no-evil dichotomy, that make one's life miserable and are absolutely unnecessary. We are gendered and pre-conditioned to expect from others, in a way similar to that in which others except from us, certain behaviors that suit our tastes, beliefs, programs. All of us, without exception, are programmed to expect certain things (lucky guy or gal who still roams somewhere the wilderness raised by wolves!). Agreement should not be one of them. Yet we all want to be agreed with. We have the need to be superior, convincing, heard, understood, respected, and sadly feared (parental and/or patriarchal authority implies fear).We all want to find similarities and forget differences. Some differences are worth not shedding, while many others can be comfortably dispensed with (you like soda, I like cheese). However, once a disagreement arises, many times, out of prejudice or out of the fear of the Different, our control or the ill-perceived idea that we are in control, collapses and we intuitively rush to re-gain it by all the necessary measures at our disposal.
In fact, more often than not, these measures are negative, wrong, unnecessarily dramatic. As far as prosecuting crime judicially, it is a necessary, albeit an evil, ugly, measure. As far as making people say, like, do, feel, deny, disassociate from or associate with what we would like them to, we seldom use reason. When we perceive we could no longer reason with (i.e. convince) an individual or a group, we use GUILT-TRIP. Reasoning ends the moment quantitative-qualitative competition begins and sound-argument driven discussion becomes mute. Convincing the other side of one's superiority by making it feel inferior is not a reasonable, logic-driven argumentation. Silencing an opposition based on economic superiority, age seniority, national, ethnic, racial, or gender superiority, as well as aesthetic superiority, is only possible through either oppression, violent or non-violent, censorship, and the subtle art of guilt-trip. And no, women are not the only queens of guilt trip. Many years of patriarchy attest to the opposite. Freud, enough with the mothers!

We succumb because we are conditioned and gendered to be liked. We oblige. We follow, we strive, we achieve mainly because we want approval. Some of us manage to turn that aim onto themselves. To get precisely our own approval. For many of us, inevitably, at some point some residual voices whisper in the brain's cobwebbed niches that exact same chant which others have so perpetually chanted to us. Be more accomplished, be more aesthetically pleasing, be more agreeable to us, be more like us, be more of our taste and predilection. Be more patriotic. Raise your kids more like we raised you. be more like your brother. Yes. And no.
Very few individuals can truly remain independent outside of the grip of societal guilt-trip. One example I can give is Albert Einstein. He seems to have not cared much for the opinion of any country, religious or ethnic group. He managed to remain himself. Saying so, doesn't postulate that he lacked regret for some of his actions/allegiances. Being a human being, i am sure Albert did.
But hey, it takes courage to fight a sweet old grandmother who is wagging her finger at us for the things she perceives we are doing wrong or not doing at all. Even harder, when she is our old sweet Grammy. If her views need fighting we hold back not to insult her. Even if she borders on the fanatic, dogmatic we hold back because of guilt-trip. It takes a case of egregious discrimination or criminal behavior, of course, to make us jump out of our seats! but the rest we are conditioned to let go by the mechanisms of guilt-trip and meddling.

Why can't we always jump out of our seats when our personal lives and spaces, our individualities are being attacked or at stake? Why is that fear of disappointment so strongly gripping us? Because we don't want to disappoint the people we love, albeit many times, they have disappointed us greatly. We forgive and move on. We don't want to hurt the people we love, albeit they have hurt us plenty. Hurt is always stronger with people of our own families, of our friendly circles, with the people we do business. And yet these are the people that guilt-trip us the most. It is a vicious cycle in which our misbehavior or the perceived DIFFERENT behavior fires back at us in the form of guilt-trip, and then we are bound to rebel and misbehave again to show that we felt oppressed and hurt by the guilt and accusations that were thrown at us. Beautifully ironic - the guilt-trip perpetrators are pre-conditioned by the same vicious cycle of guilt that has once been used upon them.

Dare break the circular tradition of Guilt-Trip? Say NO!.... ?

How sweet and simple it sounds and, at the same time, how harsh and hard to do it really is. It is hard to say NO to things which are twisted in a way that subtly manipulates without confronting. It is very hard to say NO to things which might (or might not) result in hurt based upon the perception and reception of guilt, on one hand, and on the other - the agenda and the misrepresented and misplaced sensibilities of the perpetrator. Time and time again we end up guilt-tripping ourselves as products of the cultures of guilt we grew up in and still live in (no nationality or society is immune to the methodic guilt-tripping of kids and adults). "If I don't do that, I will disappoint so and so." "If I say this I will offend such and such." "If I stand up for myself I will be excluded from this and that...". Since when did it become alright to stop ourselves from thinking for ourselves, from taking charge of our own destinies? Since when or why is it alright to be asked to hold back or change in order to please the expectations of others?

IT IS possible to find equilibrium. But it is one of the longest, most tedious and uneven processes and endeavors we could take. As far as convincing others of our beliefs and views, we never truly could. Nor we should. But as far as showing them that we could believe, behave and be different (not divisive) and still care about each other - this truly is a tricky, sticky, sobering and maturing moment. One of the loneliest but most rewarding moments in life!

On Prejudice

It is not just the non-acceptance of any particular group or nationality, ethnicity, race, sexual orientation, faith, gender, age, etc...it is the belief, or sometimes the uncomfortable fear, that someone who is different is somehow wrong, or astray, or frightening, or dangerous, or inferior/superior. we (the pronoun here is not aimed at anyone in particular, rather speaking in general) do not understand different. different scares us. different closes the door the mind is so slowly, if ever, trying to open.

in my nascent 14th year in these united and divided states of America i am experiencing everything with the fullest possible thirst to see, learn, know, improve...
i have been recently told that i am severing my ties with my homeland, that I am pulling away. a note on this as well...it took me 14 years to get to know what different looks like and to be OK with it! YES! I am different and I am OK with it! there are plenty of things in the politics/policies of this country that i don't like. in my home country's too ...however i am not holding the people, the nation as a whole, responsible, because to do so it'd be prejudicial.

when i began seriously studying history and criticism of art I met with an educator who opened my eyes to possibilities. in order to understand art, even the most hideous creations or the ones that erroneously receive the label "not-art", we need to spend time analyzing them and then accepting them. Accepting them as possible. But why? But why not?!? Accepting does not mean liking. Accepting does not mean endorsing... Accepting means finding common ground, a starting point. Accepting is acknowledging someone's presence, the right to existence...Finding a positive start, then critically assessing that which needs critiquing has proven to work better than outright denying it or denigrating it.

in the case of people diametrically opposed to us, the case is more so evident - it is not that certain people are bad, good, admirable or despicable, it is that we haven't accepted them as different. please don't misinterpret my words regarding criminals and murder. the actions of people are often illegal. they cause harm. we do not accept the actions of people who cause harm and we have a way of penalizing them by the measures of the judicial system. it is not that these people turned bad and were once good . it is that they chose to do something bad...and that is a very delicate difference...

but to go on and claim from faulty and misunderstood patriotism, tradition or upbringing that WE (all who think and act similarly) are better/right and that THEY (all who think differently) are worse/wrong is simply ignorant and ushers in a destructive competitiveness. moreover, it is dangerous. diversity breeds tolerance. division, holding on to allegiances, traditions and heritages in a mistaken way causes pain and suffering, war and destruction, disappointment and aggravation. it is OK to be different, diverse, multicultural, pluralistic, pacifist. it is not a sign of weakness, or anti-patriotism, or nihilism, or atheism...one needs to be able to laugh at one's own self/ heritage/tradition/beliefs in order to be free...if one chooses to be free. again, very delicate difference...

Why not be who you are, striving to be a better human being if you can, without worrying to who, to what or where do you belong? why not belong to YOURSELF first and foremost, and then through empathy understand the other side?...that there IS another side... why necessitate the calamity of prejudice by trying to fit, at any cost, yourself and others, into oppressive, disrespectful pigeonholes? Einstein himself asked us why build our "inner equilibrium upon such insecure foundations" as the "opinions, habits, and judgments of one's fellows"?

And all that being said, i divorce myself from the labels "you XYZ"/"us ABC". I refuse to belong neither here, nor there. I choose to not belong. But I, I belong to myself.

Welcome


This blog starts as an experiment on Diversity, Tolerance and the fostering of the Different.  While we can utilize our differences to constructive purposes, by following an opposite agenda of divisiveness or discrimination we are led to the destructive. Please do not come here to hate, denigrate, deny and derogate. It is clearly not the place for you if you hold such an intent. Otherwise, you voices are welcome.
Through examples from art, literature, music, history, philosophy, technology, socio-political and cultural life in the States and abroad, I will attempt to curate here a space for free-flowing ideas designed around pluralism, inclusiveness, multiculturalism, non-partisanism, non-religiousness. As much as the focus is on diversity, it is also on subversity.   The latter is not an official entry in the dictionary, yet as pun I use it to signify a subversive attempt to turn on its head that which we consider old and regressive - backwards social concepts and obsolete traditions, social misconceptions of the kind "must" and "don't", as well as the judgmental and prejudicial mode of thinking still exhibited in cultures across the world.
Finally, the name is to be understood quite literally  - I really tend to do lots of good thinking and productive writing while folding laundry - and quite metaphorically, in the sense that many stones will be turned and many  uncomfortable truths will be exposed, i.e.  airing some dirty laundry. Ironically, it is also a tongue- in- cheek joke for the feminist and proletariat in you : what worthwhile thoughts  or wisdom can a person doing laundry bestow upon the world, wink, wink?
Welcome.